Earthquake Engineering Library

Individuals in the United States may borrow the following publications by completing the Earthquake Engineering Library section of the NISEE order form.

900/CS1. Wing Headquarters, F.E. Warren Air Force Base. Sparks, Nev.: Stantec Consulting, 1999. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 1)

900/CS2. Seismic rehabilitation of U.S. Federal Building/ Post Office/ Courthouse, Missoula, Montana. Portland, Ore.: Miller Consulting Engineers. 1998. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 2)

900/CS3. Presidio of San Francisco, Building 650, Stillwell Hall. San Francisco, Calif.: Creegan & D'Angelo. 1998. 3 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 3)

900/CS4. Seismic rehabilitation of LLNL building 141 — electronics shops, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California. Pleasanton, Calif.: Peoples Assocs. 1999. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 4)

900/CS5. Seismic rehabilitation of the F.B.I. parking garage, Los Angeles, California. San Diego, Calif.: Libby Engineers. 1998. 3 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 5)

900/CS6. Seismic rehabilitation of pump station no. 2A, Clark County, NV. San Diego, Calif.: Simon Wong Engineering. 1998. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 6)

900/CS7. Fort Riley, Kansas: Building Seismic Safety Council case study no. 7. Columbus, Ohio: Burgess & Niple. 1998. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 7)

900/CS8. FEMA case study #8, final design [Hunter Ligget]. Rev. 2. Irvine, Calif.: International Consulting Engineers. 1998. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 8)

900/CS9. Main Library at Fort Lewis, Washington: NEHRP Guidelines Case Study Project, case study no. 9. Seattle, Wash.: AlmaJos´e Engineers. 1999. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 9)

900/CS10. Seismic rehabilitation for Tinker Air Force Base dormitories. Tulsa, Okla.: Wallace Engineering. 1998. 6 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 10)

900/CS11.1. Arctic building: FEMA-273 case study no. 11.1, Seattle, Washington. Seattle, Wash.: Coughlin, Porter, Lundeen. 1998. 2 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no.11.1)

900/CS11.2. Arctic building, Seattle, Washington [for] Building Seismic Safety Council. Seattle, Wash.: Skilling, Ward, Magnusson, Barkshire. 1998. 3 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 11.2)

900/CS12. Seismic study of building 03-0123, Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico for NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Atlanta, Ga.: O'Kon & Company. 1998. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 12)

900/CS13. Pomerene Hall, Presidio of Monterey, California. San Diego, Calif.: Curry Price Court. 1999. 2 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 13)

900/CS14. Hospital building 1530, Scott Air Force Base, Illinois : FEMA 273/274 Guidelines Case Study Project, Case Study no. 14. Nashville, Tenn.: Stanley D. Lindsey and Assoc.], ßc 1998. 6 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 14)

900/CS15. Seismic rehabilitation case study per FEMA 273/274 Guidelines for federal office building #10A, Washington, D.C. Rockville, Md.: Cagley & Assocs. 1998. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 15)

900/CS16. Evaluation of the U.S. Courthouse, Seattle, for the National Institute of Building Sciences. Seattle, Wash.: KPFF Consulting Engineers. 1998. 4 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 16)

900/CS17. Veterans Administration main hospital, San Juan, Puerto Rico. Los Angeles: Nabih Youssef & Assoc. 1999. 6 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 17)

900/CS18. Boston Veterans Administration main hospital, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts. North Providence, R.I. Odeh Engineers]. 1999. 4 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 18)

900/CS19. Seismic rehabilitation of auditorium, Presidio of Monterey, Annex, California. Troy, N.Y.: Ryan-Biggs. 1998. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 19)

900/CS20. Rehabilitation guidelines case study, evaluation of steel frame with masonry infill: Nix Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Spring Hill, Calif.: James A. Hill & Assoc. 1999. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 20)

900/CS21. BSSC case study number 21, EDD building Sacramento, California. Palo Alto, Calif.: Rinne & Peterson. 1998. 3 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no.21)

900/CS22. Fire station, Fort Riley, Kansas: case study no. 22, final submission. Arlington, Va.: Daniel, Mann, Johnson & Mendenhall. 1998. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 22)

900/CS24.1. Kmetz, Matthew J. et al. Veterans Administration main hospital: case study evaluation of NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. New York: Weidlinger Assocs. 1998. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 24.1)

900/CS24.2. Veterans Administration main hospital, Brooklyn, New York: BSSC case study number 24.2. King of Prussia, Pa.: Cagley, Harman & Assoc. 1999. 2 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 24.2)

900/CS25. Seismic rehabilitation of fire station, building 6, McChord Air Force Base, Washington. Everett, Wash.: Reid Middleton. 1998. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no.25)

900/CS27. Clifford Davis Federal Building, Memphis, Tennessee. Portland, Ore.: H.J. Degenkolb Assocs. 1999. 2 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 27)

900/CS28. Final submittal for NEHRP guidelines case study project : case study 28, Coast Guard building, San Francisco, California. San Francisc: Tennebaum-Manheim Engineers. 1998. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 28)

900/CS29. Dormitory building #2402, Moses Lake, Washington : case study 29. Olympia, Wash.: Sargent Engineers. 1998. 2 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 29)

900/CS30.1. BSSC Case studies project, UCB Tolman Hall. Los Angeles: John A. Martin and Assoc. 1999. 6 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no.30.1)

900/CS30.2. Tolman Hall, University of California, Berkeley, California campus : BSSC Case studies project, case study no. 30.2. Oakland, Calif.: ICF Kaiser. 1998. 4 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no.30.2)

900/CS31. Case Study evaluation of NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings: IRS Service Center, Ogden, Utah, 100% submittal. Oakland, Calif.: EQE International. 1999. 3 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 31)

900/CS32. U.S. Post Office and Courthouse, Moscow, Idaho seismic rehabilitation study. San Francisco: David Bonowitz. 1998. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 32)

900/CS33. Seismic rehabilitation of airport traffic control tower, Carbondale, Illinois: final design submittal. San Francisco: URS Greiner. 1998. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no.33)

900/CS34. Final report for Old Courthouse, St. Louis, Missouri: FEMA 273 seismic retrofit case study no. 34. San Francisco: Forell/Elsesser Engineers. 1998. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 34)

900/CS36. Building 43-410 Elmendorf AFB, Alaska: final submittal. Anchorage, Alaska: BBFM Engineers. 1999. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no.36)

900/CS37. VA hospital, building 2, Roseburg, Oregon. Madison, Wis.: Flad & Assocs. 1999. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 37)

900/CS38. Bureau of Reclamation's Klamath Basin Project headquarters, Klamath Falls, Oregon, case study #38. Portland, Ore.: Walker, Diloreto, Younie. 1999. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no.38)

900/CS39. FEMA 273/274 NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings: case study no. 42 [i.e. 39] Pinole, Calif.: ALX Engineering. 1999. 2 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no.39)

900/CS40. Seismic evaluation report, case study no. 40, NEHRP seismic guidelines case studies project. Monroeville, Pa.: Paul C. Rizzo Assocs. 1999. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no.40)

900/CS41. BSSC case study 41: Seattle office building. Seattle, Wash.: Swenson Say Faget. 1999. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 41)

900/CS42. Design report, methodology and comparison of LDP/NSP with current UBC 194. San Francisco: MFT Consulting Engineers. 1999. 1 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no.42)

900/CS43. Shea, Gregory F. New building code comparison, model building type W1, wood light frames: project: Clatsop Retirement Village, ALF, Astoria, Oregon. Portland, Ore.: Moffatt, Nichol & Bonney. 1999. 2 v. (FEMA 273 Guidelines Case Studies Project; no. 43)