Global collapse in earthquake engineering refers to the inability of a structural system to sustain gravity loads when subjected to seismic excitation. The research described in this report proposes a methodology for evaluating global incremental (side-sway) collapse based on a relative intensity measure instead of an engineering demand para meter (EDP). The relative intensity is the ratio of ground motion intensity to a structural strength parameter, which is increased until the response of the system becomes unstabl e. At this stage the relative intensity – EDP curve becomes flat (zero slope). The largest relative intensity is referred to as “collapse capacity.”
In order to implement the methodology, deteriorating hysteretic models are developed to represent the monotonic and cyclic behavior of structural components. Parameter studies that utilize these deteriorating models are performed to obtain collapse capacities and quantify the effects of system parameters that most influence collapse for SDOF and MDOF systems. The dispersion of the collapse capacity due to record to record variability and uncertainty in the system parameters is evaluated. The latter sour ce of dispersion is quantified by means of the first-order second-moment method. The studies reveal that softening of the post-yield stiffness in the backbone curve (post-capping stiffness) and the displacement at which this softening commences (defined by the ductility capacity) are the two system parameters that most influence the collapse capacity of a system . Cyclic deterioration is an important but not dominant issue for collapse evaluation. P-delta effects greatly accelerate the collapse of deteri orating systems and may be the primary source of collapse for flexible but very ductile structural systems.
The report presents applications of the proposed collapse methodology to the development of collapse fragility curves and the evaluation of the mean annual frequency of collapse.
An important contribution is the development of a transparent methodology for the evaluation of incremental collapse in which the assessment of collapse is closely related to the physical phenomena that lead to this limit state. The methodology addresses the fact that collapse is caused by deterioration in complex assemblies of structural com ponents that should be modeled explicitly.
Full List of PEER Reports: click here.